9.00-9.30 Welcoming Remarks
9.30–10.00 Keynote lecture
Francisco Perez De Los Cobos, President of the Spanish Constitutional Court
Los votos particulares en la jurisprudencia del tribunal constitucional
10.00–13.30 Panel: National and Constitutional Courts
Chairman: Nicolò Zanon, Judge of the Italian Constitutional Court
Peter M. Huber, Judge of the German Constitutional Court
Sondervotum at the Bundesverfassungsgericht – Evaluation of 50 years of practise
Randy Kozel, Notre Dame University (USA) and clerk at the U.S. Supreme Court
Dissenting Opinions and Precedent
Wanda Mastor, Université de Toulouse I (France)
The Performative Effect of Separate Opinions on the Majority Decision
Mario Jori, University of Milan
Dissenting Opinions: Some Philosophical Considerations
Gigliola di Renzo Villata, University of Milan
Collegialità/motivazione/ ‘voto di scissura’: quali le ragioni storiche della nostra ‘multiforme’ tradizione?
Saulle Panizza, University of Pisa
L’emersione del dissenso nella Corte costituzionale italiana attraverso i casi di sostituzione del giudice relatore
Marilisa D’Amico, University of Milan
Corte costituzionale italiana e assenza della dissenting opinion: criticità e prospettive
Ennio Amodio, University of Milan
Stile della sentenza penale italiana e opinioni dissenzienti: una convivenza impossibile
13.30-15.00 Break
15.00–15.30 Keynote lecture:
Guido Raimondi, President of the European Court of Human Rights
Advantages and Risks of Separate Opinions from the Point of View of the European Court of Human Rights
15.30–17.30 Panel: International and Supranational Courts
Chairman: Antonio Gambaro, University of Milan, Accademia dei Lincei
Tullio Treves, Judge emeritus of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea
Pros and Cons of Individual Opinions in International Tribunals: The Experience of the Law of the Sea Tribunal
Giorgio Gaja, Judge of the International Court of Justice
Dissenting Opinions in the International Court of Justice
Melchior Wathelet, First Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Union
Revirement et dissenting opinion en droit de l’Union européenne
Massimo Condinanzi, University of Milan
Il dialogo tra giudici: alternativa alla dissenting opinion nel sistema giudiziario dell’Unione europea